ISSN: 2376-127X

妊娠と小児の健康に関するジャーナル

オープンアクセス

当社グループは 3,000 以上の世界的なカンファレンスシリーズ 米国、ヨーロッパ、世界中で毎年イベントが開催されます。 1,000 のより科学的な学会からの支援を受けたアジア および 700 以上の オープン アクセスを発行ジャーナルには 50,000 人以上の著名人が掲載されており、科学者が編集委員として名高い

オープンアクセスジャーナルはより多くの読者と引用を獲得
700 ジャーナル 15,000,000 人の読者 各ジャーナルは 25,000 人以上の読者を獲得

インデックス付き
  • 索引コペルニクス
  • Google スカラー
  • アカデミックキー
  • レフシーク
  • ハムダード大学
  • エブスコ アリゾナ州
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • パブロン
  • ジュネーブ医学教育研究財団
  • ユーロパブ
  • ICMJE
このページをシェアする

抽象的な

A Pilot Study of the Use of Blood Markers of Alcohol Use and Brief Intervention during Pregnancy

Joan M Stoler, Peter W Forbes, Marla J Burton, Amy Rubin, Elaine M Heffernan, Martha T Kane, Jeffrey Ecker, Ronald Iverson and Lewis B Holmes

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of feedback of maternal blood markers in decreasing alcohol intake and improving neonatal outcomes.

Method: Pregnant women were screened using a validated alcohol-screening questionnaire, the TWEAK, and blood markers of alcohol use (hemoglobin-associated aldehyde, mean red blood cell volume, carbohydrate deficient transferrin and gamma glutamyl transpeptidase). There were two independently recruited cohorts: 1) a reference group without feedback of the blood marker results, and 2) a subsequent feedback group with feedback of the blood results. Self-reported alcohol use, marker results over time, infant size and gestational age of the infant of the mothers with a positive alcohol screening questionnaire and at least one positive marker (Ns=53 and 38, respectively) were compared between the two cohorts.

Results: Feedback of the blood marker results was an incentive to decrease alcohol intake in the majority of women with positive markers, as after the initial positive assay, there were fewer subsequent positive markers. More women in the feedback group had normalization of the markers compared to those in the reference group who did not have feedback (p=0.005). Furthermore the reported average daily absolute ounces of alcohol use before the feedback was 0.17 versus 0.01 ounces after feedback (p=0.004). In contrast the reported average daily absolute ounces of alcohol use in the reference cohort at the time of first blood draw was 0.042 compared to 0.031 at the time of the second blood draw (not statistically significant). There was no difference between groups in the birth size of the infants.

Conclusion: These blood markers were useful as identifiers of at-risk women and motivational and monitoring tools in the care of alcohol abusing pregnant women. The women who received this intervention reported significantly reduced alcohol use and had fewer positive markers.