当社グループは 3,000 以上の世界的なカンファレンスシリーズ 米国、ヨーロッパ、世界中で毎年イベントが開催されます。 1,000 のより科学的な学会からの支援を受けたアジア および 700 以上の オープン アクセスを発行ジャーナルには 50,000 人以上の著名人が掲載されており、科学者が編集委員として名高い

オープンアクセスジャーナルはより多くの読者と引用を獲得
700 ジャーナル 15,000,000 人の読者 各ジャーナルは 25,000 人以上の読者を獲得

インデックス付き
  • 索引コペルニクス
  • Google スカラー
  • シェルパ・ロミオ
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • セーフティライト付き
  • レフシーク
  • ハムダード大学
  • エブスコ アリゾナ州
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • パブロン
  • ジュネーブ医学教育研究財団
  • ユーロパブ
  • ICMJE
このページをシェアする

抽象的な

A Systematic Review on Evolving the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England: Targeted Screening for Individuals with First Degree Family History of Bowel Cancer

Rutendo L Chigonda

First degree relatives of bowel cancer cases have an approximately twofold risk of the disease compared with those without a family history, and the more affected first degree relatives an individual has, the higher the absolute and relative risk for developing bowel cancer. At present, widespread screening of average risk individuals for bowel cancer occurs in England; however, the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme does not currently provide a framework for the identification of a family history of bowel cancer. The aim is to determine the cost effectiveness and benefits of offering targeted screening to individuals with a first degree family history of bowel cancer. The primary outcomes examined the prevalence of developing bowel cancer and estimated the cost effectiveness to inform screening policy decisions. The secondary outcome evaluated the possible screening barriers in the adoption of bowel screening of first degree relatives. Data presented suggests that screening first degree relatives of patients with bowel cancer is likely to be cost effective to the NHS, and that compared with the average risk group using colonoscopy, advanced neoplasia was significantly more prevalent in those with first degree relatives with bowel cancer. Targeted screening would mean less long term health costs however, given the limited resources on NHS cost analysis data, cost savings associated with targeted screening are largely unknown; although data presented from European studies strongly suggests that it may be optimistic. Opportunities for this review include its recommendation to modify the screening criteria to extended to first degree relatives of bowel cancer patients and for the National Screening Committee to implement this protocol nationwide.