当社グループは 3,000 以上の世界的なカンファレンスシリーズ 米国、ヨーロッパ、世界中で毎年イベントが開催されます。 1,000 のより科学的な学会からの支援を受けたアジア および 700 以上の オープン アクセスを発行ジャーナルには 50,000 人以上の著名人が掲載されており、科学者が編集委員として名高い

オープンアクセスジャーナルはより多くの読者と引用を獲得
700 ジャーナル 15,000,000 人の読者 各ジャーナルは 25,000 人以上の読者を獲得

インデックス付き
  • 索引コペルニクス
  • Google スカラー
  • シェルパ・ロミオ
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • セーフティライト付き
  • レフシーク
  • ハムダード大学
  • エブスコ アリゾナ州
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • パブロン
  • ジュネーブ医学教育研究財団
  • ユーロパブ
  • ICMJE
このページをシェアする

抽象的な

Compliance in the Peer Approaches to Lupus Self-Management (PALS) Study: Program Evaluation and Comparison to Existing Support Modalities for Patients with Rheumatic Conditions

Faith TD, Rose J, Horton R and Williams EM

Background: Peer Approaches to Lupus Self-Management (PALS) was a peer support program tailored to the population most affect by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); African American women. Methods: Compliance in the PALS study was measured as weekly phone call sessions completed by each mentoring pair. Additional compliance data were collected from other interventions providing peer support and education with the purpose of improving quality of life and/or disease activity. Compliance data were compared to determine factors associated with higher levels of compliance in this disease population. Results: PALS proved to be a highly acceptable intervention with regard to the counseling, support, and education extended to lupus patients. Compliance data from the program showed that it was highly accessible with 100% of users in the study period completing all of the weekly mentoring sessions. Compared to other interventions, which reported compliance rates ranging from <50-82%, patients in the PALS program were much more compliant to protocols and schedules. PALS compliance was most similar to that of the LupusLine® peer support telephone program, which achieved 97% compliance. Conclusions: Despite limitations, results indicate patient satisfaction, positive impact, and increased compliance with the approach of the PALS study. Other programs in similar populations struggle with compliance, whereas PALS and LupusLine® users were highly compliant. A factor common to both programs was the use of trained peers to deliver support via telephone calls, possibly indicating that this delivery method may be particularly effective for promoting compliance in this population.