当社グループは 3,000 以上の世界的なカンファレンスシリーズ 米国、ヨーロッパ、世界中で毎年イベントが開催されます。 1,000 のより科学的な学会からの支援を受けたアジア および 700 以上の オープン アクセスを発行ジャーナルには 50,000 人以上の著名人が掲載されており、科学者が編集委員として名高い

オープンアクセスジャーナルはより多くの読者と引用を獲得
700 ジャーナル 15,000,000 人の読者 各ジャーナルは 25,000 人以上の読者を獲得

インデックス付き
  • 索引コペルニクス
  • Google スカラー
  • Jゲートを開く
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • 中国国家知識基盤 (CNKI)
  • 電子ジャーナルライブラリ
  • レフシーク
  • ハムダード大学
  • エブスコ アリゾナ州
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • 仮想生物学図書館 (vifabio)
  • パブロン
  • ジュネーブ医学教育研究財団
  • ユーロパブ
  • ICMJE
このページをシェアする

抽象的な

Considerations for the Deactivation of the Stimulation Function of Pacemakers and Defibrillators in End Stage Disease

Nägele Herbert, Groene E, Stierle D, Nägele MP

Background: The deactivation of anti-tachycardia functions of implantable cardiac devices such as pacemakers and defibrillators in end stage disease becomes clinical routine. Uncertainty exists about the deactivation of the stimulation function.

Methods: To collect information about possible consequences of the deactivation of stimulation we retrospectively analyzed device interrogation data of a total of 363 patients. 244 data stem from consecutive routine ambulatory patients and 119 from patients later died due to their chronic underlying illnesses.

Results: Routinely interrogated and later deceased patients are comparable for age at implantation (76.6 ± 9.4 vs 74 ± 7.7) and sex (females 26% vs 26%). Patients were divided in three groups: group A) no expected sequelae from deactivation (spontaneous heart rate >50/min, 51.5%), group B) expected reduced quality of life (spontaneous heart rate 30-50 or presence of cardiac resynchronization therapy; 34.7%) and group C) expected timely death (spontaneous heart rate<30; 13.8%). 

Discussion: According to our results only minorities of device patients (13.8%) are “truly” pacemaker dependent and were expected to die shortly after deactivation of stimulation (Group C). A third of patients may survive, but probably with a reduced quality of life either due to insufficient heart rate or loss of resynchronization (Group B). For more than a half of the patient’s deactivation of antibradycardia - stimulation seems to be irrelevant (Group A).  We conclude that the deactivation of the stimulation function of cardiac devices in palliative situations may be of lesser importance in the process of dying and may reduce quality of life.