ISSN: 2161-0460

アルツハイマー病とパーキンソン病のジャーナル

オープンアクセス

当社グループは 3,000 以上の世界的なカンファレンスシリーズ 米国、ヨーロッパ、世界中で毎年イベントが開催されます。 1,000 のより科学的な学会からの支援を受けたアジア および 700 以上の オープン アクセスを発行ジャーナルには 50,000 人以上の著名人が掲載されており、科学者が編集委員として名高い

オープンアクセスジャーナルはより多くの読者と引用を獲得
700 ジャーナル 15,000,000 人の読者 各ジャーナルは 25,000 人以上の読者を獲得

インデックス付き
  • 索引コペルニクス
  • Google スカラー
  • シェルパ・ロミオ
  • Jゲートを開く
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • アカデミックキー
  • ジャーナル目次
  • 中国国家知識基盤 (CNKI)
  • 電子ジャーナルライブラリ
  • レフシーク
  • ハムダード大学
  • エブスコ アリゾナ州
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • SWBオンラインカタログ
  • 仮想生物学図書館 (vifabio)
  • パブロン
  • ジュネーブ医学教育研究財団
  • ユーロパブ
  • ICMJE
このページをシェアする

抽象的な

Dementia Screening Tools in Primary Care: What is the Current Screening Tests Scenario?

Maria Gabriela Trocoli Zanetti, Joyce de Souza Silveira Ribeiro, Nayra Almeida da Silva, Sandra Purchio Duarte Leite, Nayara Marques, Isabela F Gattas Vernaglia

More than 35 million people worldwide suffer from dementia syndromes, numbers that are expected to triple in up to 40 years and Brazil follows this trend of growth. As the world population is aging and in old age these syndromes are more common, health services are looking for ways to reduce the difficulties of assertive diagnosis of dementia syndromes in primary care. The objective of the study was to conduct a systematic literature review on the main tools used for the screening of dementia syndromes in primary care, in order to assess whether there is any more appropriate cognitive screening test. There was a systematic review of reviews, with pre-registration in PROSPERO 246275. The PubMed electronic database has been consulted for relevant publications. The review started on 20 August 2020. The following search strategies were employed: ((dementia (Mesh)) AND primary care (MeSH Terms)) AND ((diagnosis (MeSH Terms)). The publications returned by the search strategies were examined to identify possible duplicates and the remaining ones were examined in two stages. Two independent reviewers evaluated each article and inconsistencies in the inclusion decisions were remedied by discussion and consensus. Five specific articles on the theme were selected. It was concluded that the level of schooling directly focuses on the effectiveness and results of different tests, making it evident that effective tests for one population do not suit another and thus new, more complete tools need to be developed and applied for a broader screening capacity.