ISSN: 2329-6879

産業医学および健康問題

オープンアクセス

当社グループは 3,000 以上の世界的なカンファレンスシリーズ 米国、ヨーロッパ、世界中で毎年イベントが開催されます。 1,000 のより科学的な学会からの支援を受けたアジア および 700 以上の オープン アクセスを発行ジャーナルには 50,000 人以上の著名人が掲載されており、科学者が編集委員として名高い

オープンアクセスジャーナルはより多くの読者と引用を獲得
700 ジャーナル 15,000,000 人の読者 各ジャーナルは 25,000 人以上の読者を獲得

インデックス付き
  • 索引コペルニクス
  • Google スカラー
  • Jゲートを開く
  • アカデミックキー
  • 中国国家知識基盤 (CNKI)
  • レフシーク
  • ハムダード大学
  • エブスコ アリゾナ州
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • パブロン
  • ジュネーブ医学教育研究財団
  • ユーロパブ
  • ジュネーブ医学教育研究財団
  • ICMJE
このページをシェアする

抽象的な

Efficacy of the Bobath Concept in Improving Performance in Activities of Daily Living in Patients after Stroke: A Literature Review

Eirini Kolliopoulou

Despite its long background, since the 1940s, and its wide use, there are few studies regarding the results of Neurodevelopmental Treatment (NDT) in stroke patients. Objectives: To investigate the efficacy of the Bobath concept in the functionality and independence in activities and the use of upper limb compared to the usual treatment in the neurological rehabilitation after stroke. Design: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials, controlled trials, pilot studies, quasi-experimental studies and previous systematic reviews. Population: Adults after stroke. Materials and Methods: A systematic review of the literature on the Bobath concept from the first available publication in 2012 until December of 2022 was performed, consulting Pubmed, PEDro, Epistemonikos, CercaTot UVic, Sciencedirect and Cochrane Library databases. PEDro scale was used to determine methodological quality. Intervention: Treatment based on the Bobath concept compared to other or no interventions. Outcomes: Activities of Daily Living and upper limb motor activity. Results: Nine clinical trials and two systematic reviews were included; all but two studies compared the Bobath concept with another intervention. PEDro scale scores ranged from 3 to 7. There is limited evidence of the superiority of Bobath over other interventions, especially amplitude exercises and stretching, in producing significant changes in upper limb activity. Therapy based on Bobath concept is less effective than robotics and task-oriented training. The superiority of Bobath concept or any other therapeutic approach cannot be concluded regarding Activities of Daily Living and quality of life of stroke patients. Conclusions: No solid documentation was found describing the superiority of neurodevelopmental treatment, nor of any other advanced intervention, to consider it recommended for the improvement of functionality and quality of life after stroke. Methodological aspects of the selected studies are presented for future research. It is strongly recommended that future clinical trials analyze the functional benefits of the Bobath concept.