ISSN: 2161-1165

疫学: オープンアクセス

オープンアクセス

当社グループは 3,000 以上の世界的なカンファレンスシリーズ 米国、ヨーロッパ、世界中で毎年イベントが開催されます。 1,000 のより科学的な学会からの支援を受けたアジア および 700 以上の オープン アクセスを発行ジャーナルには 50,000 人以上の著名人が掲載されており、科学者が編集委員として名高い

オープンアクセスジャーナルはより多くの読者と引用を獲得
700 ジャーナル 15,000,000 人の読者 各ジャーナルは 25,000 人以上の読者を獲得

インデックス付き
  • 索引コペルニクス
  • Google スカラー
  • シェルパ・ロミオ
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • セーフティライト付き
  • Global Online Research in Agriculture (AGORA) へのアクセス
  • 国際農業生物科学センター (CABI)
  • レフシーク
  • ハムダード大学
  • エブスコ アリゾナ州
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • CABI全文
  • キャブダイレクト
  • パブロン
  • ジュネーブ医学教育研究財団
  • ユーロパブ
  • ICMJE
このページをシェアする

抽象的な

Health Care Worker Intake of Oseltamivir as Post Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) During a Nursing Home Influenza Outbreak: Predictors of PEP Willingness

Veldman-Ariesen MJ, Sen-Kerpiclik F, Enserink R, Van der Sande MAB1 and Van Delden JJM

Background:
Health care workers may protect residents from the (sometimes severe) consequences of influenza infection by taking oseltamivir as Post Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) during a nursing home influenza outbreak. The main aim of this study was to explore demographic, social, and organizational factors associated with willingness to take PEP among health care workers.
Methods:
We distributed to 652 health care workers an anonymous, self-administered questionnaire with 46 questions in three parts: 11 demographic questions, 31 social questions and four organization questions. All statistically significant factors identified in the Univariate analysis were tested in the multivariate analysis using backward selection logistic regression. Area under the Curve (AUC) was calculated to estimate the contribution of significant variables to overall willingness.
Results:
In total, 524 of 652 (80%) distributed questionnaires were returned. Of these respondents, 61% declared they were willing to take PEP during an influenza outbreak. The multivariate analysis resulted in a seven-item logistic regression model with three demographic (under 42 years of age, no children living at home, and reporting ‘physician’ as profession), and four social factors (perceived benefits, agreeing with the Dutch guideline for prevention and control of nursing home influenza outbreaks, and the social influences ‘people close to me think it’s important to get PEP with oseltamivir during an influenza outbreak’ and ‘finding it important to do what people close to me think is important’) independently associated with willingness to take PEP. The AUC was found to be 0.85 (95% CI 0.81- 0.89).
Conclusion:
We identified seven factors, which contribute to a willingness to take oseltamivir as PEP among health care workers in nursing homes. By providing social support and enhanced formal education about perceived benefits, acceptance and adherence of health care workers may be improved.