当社グループは 3,000 以上の世界的なカンファレンスシリーズ 米国、ヨーロッパ、世界中で毎年イベントが開催されます。 1,000 のより科学的な学会からの支援を受けたアジア および 700 以上の オープン アクセスを発行ジャーナルには 50,000 人以上の著名人が掲載されており、科学者が編集委員として名高い
。オープンアクセスジャーナルはより多くの読者と引用を獲得
700 ジャーナル と 15,000,000 人の読者 各ジャーナルは 25,000 人以上の読者を獲得
John Agresan
Research suggests that scientists show affirmation biases with regard to the assessment of lookup studies, in that they consider outcomes as being enhanced when learn about confirms their prior expectations. These biases may additionally have an effect on the peer assessment process, especially for research that existing controversial findings. The motive of the modern learns about was once to evaluate the comparison of a parapsychology learn about versus a neuroscience study. One hundred individuals with a history in psychology had been randomly assigned to study and consider one of two definitely equal find out about abstracts (50 members per group). One of the abstracts described the findings as if they had been from a parapsychology study, whereas the different summary described the findings as if they had been from a neuroscience study. The outcomes printed that contributors rated the neuroscience summary as having enhanced findings and as being greater legitimate and dependable than the parapsychology abstract, in spite of the reality that the two abstracts have been identical.