ISSN: E-2314-7326
P-2314-7334

神経感染症

オープンアクセス

当社グループは 3,000 以上の世界的なカンファレンスシリーズ 米国、ヨーロッパ、世界中で毎年イベントが開催されます。 1,000 のより科学的な学会からの支援を受けたアジア および 700 以上の オープン アクセスを発行ジャーナルには 50,000 人以上の著名人が掲載されており、科学者が編集委員として名高い

オープンアクセスジャーナルはより多くの読者と引用を獲得
700 ジャーナル 15,000,000 人の読者 各ジャーナルは 25,000 人以上の読者を獲得

インデックス付き
  • 索引コペルニクス
  • Google スカラー
  • Jゲートを開く
  • レフシーク
  • ハムダード大学
  • エブスコ アリゾナ州
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • キャブダイレクト
  • パブロン
  • ジュネーブ医学教育研究財団
  • ICMJE
このページをシェアする

抽象的な

Kinesio Tape vs Neuromuscular Stimulation for Conservative Treatment of Hemiplegic Shoulder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Gul Oznur Karabicak, Burcu Talu

This study aimed to compare the effects of kinesiotaping and neuromuscular electric stimulation (NMES) on pain, and motor activity and function in patients with upper extremity hemiplegia. A total of 67 outpatients who acquired ischemic stroke with the upper extremity involvement were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to an NMES group a kinesiotape implementation group and a control group in addition to the physiotherapy. Treatment duration was 4 weeks. Motor Activity Log- 28, Fugl–Meyer Sensorimotor Assessment Scale (FM), and visual analog scale (VAS) were used for the assessment. A significant improvement in FM (taping group, p ≤ 0.001, NMES, p ≤ 0.001, control group, p ≤ 0.001) and motor activity scores was found in all groups. Although this effect was superior in function for the taping group (p = 0.027). A significant decrease was found in the pain intensity both at rest (taping group: P ≤ 0.007; NMES: P ≤ 0.014) and with activity for the taping and NMES groups (taping: p≤ 0.010; NMES: p≤ 0.016). Whereas no significant decrease was found in the control group either at the rest or with activity (p = 0.054 for both). No reverse effect was reported. Data suggested that all the treatment options were effective on motor activity and pain but the kinesiotaping seemed to have a superior effect on function activity (p = 0.054 for both). No reverse effect was reported. Data suggested that all the treatment options were effective on motor activity and pain but the kinesiotaping seemed to have a superior effect on function.