当社グループは 3,000 以上の世界的なカンファレンスシリーズ 米国、ヨーロッパ、世界中で毎年イベントが開催されます。 1,000 のより科学的な学会からの支援を受けたアジア および 700 以上の オープン アクセスを発行ジャーナルには 50,000 人以上の著名人が掲載されており、科学者が編集委員として名高い
。オープンアクセスジャーナルはより多くの読者と引用を獲得
700 ジャーナル と 15,000,000 人の読者 各ジャーナルは 25,000 人以上の読者を獲得
Silvio Dragonieri
Spirometry is a pivotal tool in the objective evaluation of tailwind restriction in the opinion of asthma. The viability and utility of spirometry to confirm the opinion of asthma or habitual obstructive pulmonary complaint (COPD) during exacerbations remain unknown. Filling in these information gaps can make it easier to decide when conformational testing is necessary for clinical care and attempts to ameliorate the quality of care. The purpose of this study was to estimate the viability of spirometry and its utility in cases rehabilitated with a opinion of asthma exacerbation. Study including multiple centers and four university medical centers. Grown-ups admitted to general drug wards with a cooker’s opinion of asthma exacerbation passed spirometry. To estimate the chance of cases that were suitable to induce applicable quality spirometry data, two boards- certified pulmonologists examined the spirometry tagging. According to the 2005 recommendations from the European Respiratory Society and American Thoracic Society, the results were anatomized to assess the utility of spirometry to confirm the actuality of obstructive lung complaint. Utmost rehabilitated cases with a croaker’s opinion of asthma exacerbation can get acceptable qualityspirometry. Confirmatory spirometry may be an effective system for reducing the over opinion of obstructive lung complaint, particularly in individualities who are fat.