当社グループは 3,000 以上の世界的なカンファレンスシリーズ 米国、ヨーロッパ、世界中で毎年イベントが開催されます。 1,000 のより科学的な学会からの支援を受けたアジア および 700 以上の オープン アクセスを発行ジャーナルには 50,000 人以上の著名人が掲載されており、科学者が編集委員として名高い
。オープンアクセスジャーナルはより多くの読者と引用を獲得
700 ジャーナル と 15,000,000 人の読者 各ジャーナルは 25,000 人以上の読者を獲得
Marion Marlinge, Donato Vairo, Viviana Marolda, Laurie Bruzzese, Nabil Adjriou, Claire Guiol, Nathalie Kipson, Anna Bonnardel, Marguerite Gastaldi, François Kerbaul, Pierre Michelet, Jean Claude Deharo, Giovanna Mottola, Patrick Mace, Mohamed Chefrour and Régis Guieu
Background: Adenosine is a nucleoside that impacts the cardiovascular system during cardiovascular or inflammatory diseases. The rapid determination of adenosine in blood may be useful in emergency medicine especially in syncope diagnose or septic shock. We compare its measurement in blood using fixed potential amperometry (FPA), with usual methods: mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) or high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Methods: Twenty healthy subjects (14 men and 6 women) and ten patients suffering from vasovagal syncope (VVS, 6 women and 4 men) were included. Blood samples were collected by vein puncture for plasma adenosine assay and in the same time using finger puncture for direct FAP measurement and on blotting paper for LC-MS/MS. Results: Mean plasma adenosine concentration was 26% higher using HPLC compared with LC-MSMS; p<0.01. In whole blood, adenosine concentration was 35% higher using FPA compared with LC-MS/MS. We found a good correlation between adenosine values measured by FAP and LC-MS/MS in whole blood and between LCMS/ MS and HPLC in plasma. Mean adenosine concentration was higher in patients whatever the method used. Conclusion: Adenosine measurement to the patient’s bed, using FPA may be useful in some cases where high adenosine is associated with pejorative outcome.