当社グループは 3,000 以上の世界的なカンファレンスシリーズ 米国、ヨーロッパ、世界中で毎年イベントが開催されます。 1,000 のより科学的な学会からの支援を受けたアジア および 700 以上の オープン アクセスを発行ジャーナルには 50,000 人以上の著名人が掲載されており、科学者が編集委員として名高い

オープンアクセスジャーナルはより多くの読者と引用を獲得
700 ジャーナル 15,000,000 人の読者 各ジャーナルは 25,000 人以上の読者を獲得

インデックス付き
  • Google スカラー
  • シェルパ・ロミオ
  • Jゲートを開く
  • アカデミックキー
  • レフシーク
  • ハムダード大学
  • エブスコ アリゾナ州
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • パブロン
  • ジュネーブ医学教育研究財団
  • ユーロパブ
  • ICMJE
このページをシェアする

抽象的な

Stress Concentrations caused by Lapidus Arthrodesis: A Finite Element Study

Pasapula C , Cifuentes-De la Portilla C* , Borja Guti'errez-Navarrete , Larrainzar-Garijo R and Bayod J

Lapidus arthrodesis is used in the treatment of hallux valgus, first ray instability and midfoot arthritis. Despite being commonly performed, few studies have addressed the regional biomechanical implications of this procedure. Our objective was to analyse the stress concentrations caused by two commonly performed Lapidus arthrodesis on surrounding bone and soft tissue structures of the foot. A finite element model was used to simulate the normal intact foot and scenarios of tissues deficiencies that are often associated when a Lapidus arthrodesis is performed. Our model includes all the foot bones, cartilage and major tendons and ligaments that support the foot arch. Both tensile stress and compressive forces were measured in the midfoot bones, joints and tibialis posterior tendon. Results showed that the classical Lapidus arthrodesis is associated with an increase of about 76% in the compressive stress generated around the first and second cuneiform joint, while the isolated metatarsocuneiform arthrodesis showed a non-significant increase in stress in this region. The Lapidus procedures slightly offload tensile stresses in the tibialis posterior tendon but were not alone able to compensate for the lack of a calcaneonavicular (spring) ligament failure despite increasing the rigidity of the arch. We concluded that the Lapidus arthrodesis does have regional implications on soft tissues and bone that are difficult to define. Whilst helping to decrease stresses in the tibialis posterior tendon stress and allows correcting both the first ray deformity and stability, it cannot compensate the proximal talonavicular laxity when trying to restore the arch integrity.