ISSN: 2155-952X

バイオテクノロジーとバイオマテリアル

オープンアクセス

当社グループは 3,000 以上の世界的なカンファレンスシリーズ 米国、ヨーロッパ、世界中で毎年イベントが開催されます。 1,000 のより科学的な学会からの支援を受けたアジア および 700 以上の オープン アクセスを発行ジャーナルには 50,000 人以上の著名人が掲載されており、科学者が編集委員として名高い

オープンアクセスジャーナルはより多くの読者と引用を獲得
700 ジャーナル 15,000,000 人の読者 各ジャーナルは 25,000 人以上の読者を獲得

インデックス付き
  • 索引コペルニクス
  • Google スカラー
  • シェルパ・ロミオ
  • Jゲートを開く
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • アカデミックキー
  • 研究聖書
  • 中国国家知識基盤 (CNKI)
  • Global Online Research in Agriculture (AGORA) へのアクセス
  • 電子ジャーナルライブラリ
  • レフシーク
  • ハムダード大学
  • エブスコ アリゾナ州
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • SWBオンラインカタログ
  • 仮想生物学図書館 (vifabio)
  • パブロン
  • ジュネーブ医学教育研究財団
  • ユーロパブ
  • ICMJE
このページをシェアする

抽象的な

Taxonomic diversity of woody species from 6 agroforestry systems in two sites with a different agricultural development in Nicaragua

Willan J Caicedo, Geovana Carreño - Rocabado, Jenny C Ordoñez, Bryan Finegan, Miguel Cifuentes and Eduardo Somarriba

The continued loss of biodiversity affects ecosystem functioning and reduces provision of key ecosystem services. With an ever increasing
land area devoted to agriculture, assessing the biodiversity value of different agricultural systems is becoming a priority issue to develop strategies
that maintain biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. This study was carried out in the central-northwest part of Nicaragua, in two sites in the
municipalities of El Tuma - La Dalia and Waslala -that exemplify different state of agricultural development- and 90 farms (n=45 per site). We
assessed the taxonomic diversity and composition of the woody species that are present in six land uses under agroforestry (coffee = CF, cocoa =
CC, live fences = CV, basic grains = GB, pastures = PA and patios = PT). An inventory of all woody species with a diameter > 9.9 cm was carried
out in 171.6 ha trough different sampling units according to the land uses assessed. The floristic similarity between the two study sites according to
the Bray – Curtis index was 60%, with 144 shared species. The species rarefaction curves showed higher total species richness in Waslala than in
La Dalia. In addition there were marked differences in species richness by land use in each of the sites evaluated, as well as significant differences
(p <0.01) for species richness ha-1 and for diversity indexes H ’and D’. Finally, we also found an interaction between agricultural land use and site
(analysis of variance p <0.05). Species richness at the landscape level is different both by sites and by land uses, while the species richness ha-1
and plot diversity was only different by land use, evidencing a change in the relative importance of land uses for diversity values in every place.