ISSN: 2329-6879

産業医学および健康問題

オープンアクセス

当社グループは 3,000 以上の世界的なカンファレンスシリーズ 米国、ヨーロッパ、世界中で毎年イベントが開催されます。 1,000 のより科学的な学会からの支援を受けたアジア および 700 以上の オープン アクセスを発行ジャーナルには 50,000 人以上の著名人が掲載されており、科学者が編集委員として名高い

オープンアクセスジャーナルはより多くの読者と引用を獲得
700 ジャーナル 15,000,000 人の読者 各ジャーナルは 25,000 人以上の読者を獲得

インデックス付き
  • 索引コペルニクス
  • Google スカラー
  • Jゲートを開く
  • アカデミックキー
  • 中国国家知識基盤 (CNKI)
  • レフシーク
  • ハムダード大学
  • エブスコ アリゾナ州
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • パブロン
  • ジュネーブ医学教育研究財団
  • ユーロパブ
  • ジュネーブ医学教育研究財団
  • ICMJE
このページをシェアする

抽象的な

Theranostics Nanoparticles: Revolutionizing Cancer and Imaging

Nouran Hamza

This literature review attempted to describe theranostic nanoparticles and their use in the treatment and diagnosis of cancer. Furthermore, this paper addressed nanoparticles and their potential ability to lower radioactive dose and improvement of quality in computed tomography examinations. This review also attempted to show the positive and negative effects implementing these nanoparticles have had within the modern healthcare system. Eighteen scholarly sources were selected and explored to acquire the relevant information for this review. Nanoparticles are an emerging technological trend being explored by many researchers and healthcare workers today. These technologies are revolutionizing the healthcare industry [1]. Newer prototypes and developments of nanotechnology is being introduced, created, and analyzed every day. There has been documenting about positive aspects of implementing nanoparticles into cancer treatment; their implementation as an aid to CT dose reduction and improved image quality is also to be noted. In contrast, there are many critics still opposed to the idea of utilizing this technology and view it as nothing more than a fantasy and/or novelty. Studies of the effects these technologies have on the healthcare industry, in particular cancer, show this technology has the potential to completely revolutionize the health care world. When analyzing all these factors, it would appear this technology is being adopted more frequently than ever before. Fear of change, negative perceptions, lack of specific work, cost, toxicity, and synthesis did not accurately satisfy this claim.