移植レポート : オープンアクセス


当社グループは 3,000 以上の世界的なカンファレンスシリーズ 米国、ヨーロッパ、世界中で毎年イベントが開催されます。 1,000 のより科学的な学会からの支援を受けたアジア および 700 以上の オープン アクセスを発行ジャーナルには 50,000 人以上の著名人が掲載されており、科学者が編集委員として名高い

700 ジャーナル 15,000,000 人の読者 各ジャーナルは 25,000 人以上の読者を獲得


Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation Graft Procurement and Early Direct Charges Vs Transplantation from a Related Haploidentical Donor

Nagasaki D

Alternative patron allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants( HCTs), analogous as double umbilical cord blood transplants( dUCBT) and haploidentical related patron transplants( haplo- HCT), have been shown to be safe and effective in adult cases who do not have an HLA-identical stock or unconnected patron available. Utmost transplant centers have committed to 1 of the 2 volition patron sources, indeed with a lack of published randomized data directly comparing issues and relative data on the cost- effectiveness of dUCBT versus haplo- HCT. We conducted a retrospective study to estimate and compare the early costs and charges of haplo- HCT and dUCBT in the first 100 days at 2 US transplant centers. Forty- nine benefactors of haplo- HCT (at 1 center) and 37 with dUCBT (at another center) were included in the analysis. We compared graft accession, inpatient/ outpatient, and total charges in the first 100 days. The results of the analysis showed a significantly lower cost of graft accession and lower total charges (for 100- day HCT survivors) in favor of haplo- HCT. Importantly, to control for the obvious shortcomings of comparing costs at 2 different transplant centers, acclimations were made predicated on the current (2018) original pay envelope index and inflation rate. In the absence of further guidance from a prospective study, the cost analysis in this study suggests that haplo- HCT may affect in early cost savings over dUCBT and may be preferred by transplant centers and for cases with farther limited resources.