当社グループは 3,000 以上の世界的なカンファレンスシリーズ 米国、ヨーロッパ、世界中で毎年イベントが開催されます。 1,000 のより科学的な学会からの支援を受けたアジア および 700 以上の オープン アクセスを発行ジャーナルには 50,000 人以上の著名人が掲載されており、科学者が編集委員として名高い

オープンアクセスジャーナルはより多くの読者と引用を獲得
700 ジャーナル 15,000,000 人の読者 各ジャーナルは 25,000 人以上の読者を獲得

抽象的な

Review: Comparative Analysis of Nutrition Therapy and Dietary Recommendations

Robin Hood

Rather than receiving individualized nutrition therapy (INT), which is provided by a dietitian, many patients with type 2 diabetes receive dietary advice from nurses or doctors, despite recommendations to the contrary. We played out a meta-examination to look at the impact of INT that is furnished by an enlisted dietitian with the impact of dietary guidance that is given by other medical services experts. During this time, guidelines, reviews, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the outcomes gyrated hemoglobin (HbA1c), weight, body mass index, and LDL cholesterol were the subject of a systematic review of the Cochrane library databases, EMBASE, CINAHL, and MEDLINE. The guidelines for Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation were used to evaluate the evidence's quality and risk of bias. We found 5 RCTs with a total of 912 participants. In the principal year of mediation, nourishment treatment contrasted and dietary guidance was trailed by lower weight, what's more, lower LDL cholesterol. There were no longer-term data available. A portion of the included studies had a likely inclination, and hence, the nature of the proof was low or moderate. Furthermore, pooling essential and optional outcomes was vital.